THE CONCEPTS OF TOLERANCE AND POLITICAL CORRECTNESS IN THE CATEGORICAL FRAMEWORK OF THE HUMANITIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34132/mspc2026.03.13.21Keywords:
tolerance, political correctness, categorical framework, social philosophy, political communication, communication ethics, humanistic values, public administration.Abstract
This theses presents a theoretical analysis of the concepts of tolerance and political correctness as components of the categorical framework of the humanities. The content of these categories as well as their common and distinguishing features are identified; furthermore, their significance for the formation of a humanistic type of social relations and a democratic culture of communication is revealed. Particular attention is paid to the functional connection between tolerance and political correctness in the spheres of public administration, political communication, and education. It is demonstrated that the categories of tolerance and political correctness reflect the moral and communicative foundations of a democratic society. It is argued that tolerance serves as a value-based guideline and the foundation of an internal culture of respect for diversity. Political correctness, meanwhile, is presented as a practical tool for realizing democratic values and an external, practical form of expressing tolerance. It is noted that within the conceptual framework of the humanities, these concepts are interdisciplinary and perform an integrative function among philosophy, sociology, political science, ethics, and public administration. The conclusion emphasizes the necessity of integrating these concepts into contemporary scientific discourse as fundamental value orientations for the development of civil society. Their implementation in Ukraine across all spheres of public life is presented as a crucial condition for European integration and for the building of a responsible, open, and inclusive state.
References
Andriiash, V.I., & Yevtushenko, N.O. (2022). Evfemizmy v publichnomu dyskursi – mekhanizm politkorektnoi movnoi povedinky [Euphemisms in public discourse are a mechanism of politically correct language behavior]. Naukovi pratsi Mizhrehionalnoi Akademii upravlinnia personalom. Politychni nauky ta publichne upravlinnia – Scientific works of the International Academy of Personnel Management. Political Science and Public Administration, 2(62), (рр. 7-15). Retrieved from: https://journals.maup.com.ua/index.php/political/article/view/2128/2627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32689/2523-4625-2022-2(62)-1 [in Ukrainian].
Andriiash,V.I., & Yevtushenko, O.N. (2018). Poniattia «publichnoho upravlinnia» u vitchyznianomu naukovomu dyskursi. [The concept of «public administration» in domestic scientific discourse]. Publichne upravlinnia ta rehionalnyi rozvytoк – Public Administration and Regional Development, 1, (рр. 51-65). Retrieved from: https://pard.mk.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/50/50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26693/pard2018.01.01 [in Ukrainian].
Bondarenko, O., & Butkevych, M.(2015). Mova vorozhnechi ta ZMI: mizhnarodni standarty ta pidkhody [Hate speech and the media: international standards and approaches]. Kyiv: Proiekt «Bez Kordoniv» HO «Tsentr «Sotsialna Diia» [in Ukrainian].
Deklaratsiia pryntsypiv tolerantnosti [Declaration of Principles of Tolerance]. (n.d.). don.kyivcity.gov.ua. Retrieved from: https://don.kyivcity.gov.ua/files/2014/2/10/Deklaracija-tolerantnosti.pdf. [in Ukrainian].
Yevtushenko, N.O. (2025). Doktryna politkorektnosti ta yii rol v publichnomu upravlinni suchasnoho suspilstva [The doctrine of political correctness and its role in public administration in modern society]. Publichne upravlinnia ta rehionalnyi rozvytoк – Public Administration and Regional Development, 27, (pp. 107-125). Retrieved from: https://pard.mk.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/472/441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34132/pard2025.27.05 [in Ukrainian].
Zadoiana, L.M. (2023). Politkorektnist yak komunikatyvna katehoriia profesiinoho spilkuvannia [Political correctness as a communicative category of professional communication]. Vcheni zapysky TNU imeni V. I. Vernadskoho. Seriia: Filolohiia. Zhurnalistyka – Scientific Notes of the V. I. Vernadsky TNU. Series: Philology. Journalism, (Vol. 34), (73), 3, (рр. 19-23). Retrieved from: https://www.philol.vernadskyjournals.in.ua/journals/2023/3_2023/4.pdf. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2710-4656/2023.3/04 [in Ukrainian].
Kaptiurova, O.V. (2013). Realizatsiia kontseptu «politychna korektnist» v mas-mediinomu dyskursi [Implementation of the concept of «political correctness» in mass media discourse]. Movni i kontseptualni kartyny svitu – Language and conceptual pictures of the world, 43 (2), (рр. 137-146). Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Mikks_2013_43(2)__23 [in Ukrainian].
Posibnyk z yevropeiskoho antydyskryminatsiinoho prava [Handbook on European anti-discrimination law]. (n.d.). (2013). fra.europa.eu. Retrieved from: https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_case_law_handbook_uk.pdf. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2811/11978 [in Ukrainian].
Dubichynskii, V.V. (Eds.). (2006). Suchasnyi tlumachnyi slovnyk ukrainskoi movy [Modern Explanatory Dictionary of the Ukrainian Language]. Kharkiv: Shkola [in Ukrainian].
Equality Act: guidance. (n.d.). (2010). www.gov.uk. Retrieved from: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/equality-act-2010-guidance [in English].
Lundberg, E. (2017). Tolerance: An introduction to the concept, the research and the anthology. Mechanisms of tolerance: an anthology. Stockholm: The Living History Forum [in English].
Turner, B.S. (2003). Orientalism Postmodernism and Globalism. Routledge: Taylor & Francis eLibrary [in English].
